Verify Routing
How 7 analysts execute this task across 122 cases — auto-generated Standard Operating Procedure with adherence scoring.
Verify Routing — Mined SoP
The most common sub-step sequence observed across 296 task instances. Use the dropdown on the right to compare any deviation to this baseline.
Application Mix
Which applications analysts touch while executing this task, measured by event count and active dwell time.
| Application | Events | Event Share | Dwell Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Phobos | 298 | 92.3% | 0.0% |
| Veeva Safety | 18 | 5.6% | 100.0% |
| collaboration.merck.com | 2 | 0.6% | 0.0% |
| Microsoft Teams | 2 | 0.6% | 0.0% |
| Microsoft Outlook | 2 | 0.6% | 0.0% |
| Acrobat | 1 | 0.3% | 0.0% |
Top Cross-App Transitions (within task instance)
Consecutive events that cross application boundaries within a task instance — the signal where swivel-chair patterns live.
| From | To | Transitions |
|---|---|---|
| Phobos | Veeva Safety | 16 |
| Phobos | collaboration.merck.com | 2 |
| Veeva Safety | Microsoft Teams | 1 |
| Phobos | Acrobat | 1 |
| Veeva Safety | Microsoft Outlook | 1 |
| Phobos | Microsoft Teams | 1 |
| Phobos | Microsoft Outlook | 1 |
On-Case Application Journey (±15 min around anchor)
Apps the same analyst touched on the same case within ±15 minutes of the task anchor. Captures work that spans task boundaries — the Veeva/Acrobat/Outlook/Word context surrounding the anchor click.
Phobos DOM 1,579 events 122 cases 36.9 min
Veeva Safety DOM 1,021 events 99 cases 13.8 min
collaboration.merck.com App 31 events 11 cases
Microsoft Outlook Message 31 events 13 cases
Microsoft Teams App 23 events 18 cases
Acrobat App 20 events 8 cases
usc-excel.officeapps.live.com Document 18 events 3 cases
Microsoft Word Document 16 events 7 cases
Microsoft Excel Document 14 events 7 cases
RIM Vault DOM 12 events 2 cases 0.1 min
Adherence Vectors
Each task instance is scored on four behavioral vectors. Lower values are more adherent to the mined SoP.
Meta Score Distribution
Instance count in each 10-point adherence bucket. Right-skewed = healthy execution; long left tail = concentrated pain points.
Vector Contribution to Adherence Loss
Each vector's weighted contribution to lost adherence. The top row is your highest-leverage fix.
Lowest-Adherence Instances
The 5 task instances that scored lowest. These are the concrete cases worth investigating to understand the worst patterns.
| Case | Analyst | Score | Duration | Sub-Steps | Swivel | X-App | Revisit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2355278 | Analyst 13 | 62.5 | 1.0m | 3 | 0.67 | 0.00 | 1 |
| 2349955 | Analyst 03 | 62.5 | 0.2m | 3 | 0.67 | 0.00 | 1 |
| 2258699 | Analyst 13 | 67.5 | 0.0m | 2 | 0.50 | 0.00 | 1 |
| 2335834 | Analyst 09 | 67.5 | 0.6m | 2 | 0.50 | 0.00 | 1 |
| 2350507 | Analyst 09 | 67.5 | 1.5m | 3 | 0.67 | 0.00 | 1 |
Users on This Task
7 analysts executed this task during the pilot. Scatter plots productivity (instances per active day) against adherence (meta score). Top-right = healthy high-volume analysts; bottom-right = firefighters; top-left = careful low-volume; bottom-left = struggling.
User-by-User Breakdown
| Analyst | Instances | Inst / Day | Adherence | Weakest Vector | Swivel | X-App | Min | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ | Analyst 02 | 5 | 1.2 | 82.5 | Zero-Edit Visits | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1 |
|
Reference SoP
1
View Intake Routed
2
collaboration.merck.com
Analyst 02's Dominant Sequence
— 5 of 5 instances
1
View Intake Routed
|
||||||||
| ▸ | Analyst 05 | 18 | 2.2 | 82.5 | Zero-Edit Visits | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 |
|
Reference SoP
1
View Intake Routed
2
collaboration.merck.com
Analyst 05's Dominant Sequence
— 18 of 18 instances
1
View Intake Routed
|
||||||||
| ▸ | Analyst 01 | 46 | 5.8 | 82.3 | Zero-Edit Visits | 0.01 | 0.00 | 40 |
|
Reference SoP
1
View Intake Routed
2
collaboration.merck.com
Analyst 01's Dominant Sequence
— 45 of 46 instances
1
View Intake Routed
This analyst exhibits 2 distinct sequences across their 46 instances; the dominant one is shown.
|
||||||||
| ▸ | Analyst 12 | 38 | 4.8 | 82.1 | Zero-Edit Visits | 0.01 | 0.00 | 2,919 |
|
Reference SoP
1
View Intake Routed
2
collaboration.merck.com
Analyst 12's Dominant Sequence
— 37 of 38 instances
1
View Intake Routed
This analyst exhibits 2 distinct sequences across their 38 instances; the dominant one is shown.
|
||||||||
| ▸ | Analyst 03 | 73 | 6.6 | 81.6 | Zero-Edit Visits | 0.03 | 0.00 | 3 |
|
Reference SoP
1
View Intake Routed
2
collaboration.merck.com
Analyst 03's Dominant Sequence
— 69 of 73 instances
1
View Intake Routed
This analyst exhibits 4 distinct sequences across their 73 instances; the dominant one is shown.
|
||||||||
| ▸ | Analyst 09 | 91 | 7.0 | 81.0 | Zero-Edit Visits | 0.07 | 0.00 | 415 |
|
Reference SoP
1
View Intake Routed
2
collaboration.merck.com
Analyst 09's Dominant Sequence
— 79 of 91 instances
1
View Intake Routed
This analyst exhibits 8 distinct sequences across their 91 instances; the dominant one is shown.
|
||||||||
| ▸ | Analyst 13 | 25 | 3.6 | 80.7 | Zero-Edit Visits | 0.06 | 0.00 | 2 |
|
Reference SoP
1
View Intake Routed
2
collaboration.merck.com
Analyst 13's Dominant Sequence
— 21 of 25 instances
1
View Intake Routed
This analyst exhibits 5 distinct sequences across their 25 instances; the dominant one is shown.
|
||||||||
Verify Routing — Mined SoP
The most common sub-step sequence observed across 296 task instances. Use the dropdown on the right to compare any deviation to this baseline.
Application Mix
Which applications analysts touch while executing this task, measured by event count and active dwell time.
| Application | Events | Event Share | Dwell Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Phobos | 298 | 90.9% | 0.0% |
| Veeva Safety | 19 | 5.8% | 100.0% |
| Microsoft Teams | 3 | 0.9% | 0.0% |
| Microsoft Excel | 3 | 0.9% | 0.0% |
| collaboration.merck.com | 2 | 0.6% | 0.0% |
| Microsoft Outlook | 2 | 0.6% | 0.0% |
| Acrobat | 1 | 0.3% | 0.0% |
Top Cross-App Transitions (within task instance)
Consecutive events that cross application boundaries within a task instance — the signal where swivel-chair patterns live.
| From | To | Transitions |
|---|---|---|
| Phobos | Veeva Safety | 16 |
| Phobos | collaboration.merck.com | 2 |
| Veeva Safety | Microsoft Outlook | 1 |
| Microsoft Excel | Microsoft Teams | 1 |
| Microsoft Teams | Microsoft Excel | 1 |
| Veeva Safety | Phobos | 1 |
| Veeva Safety | Microsoft Teams | 1 |
| Veeva Safety | Microsoft Excel | 1 |
| collaboration.merck.com | Phobos | 1 |
| Microsoft Outlook | Microsoft Excel | 1 |
On-Case Application Journey (±15 min around anchor)
Apps the same analyst touched on the same case within ±15 minutes of the task anchor. Captures work that spans task boundaries — the Veeva/Acrobat/Outlook/Word context surrounding the anchor click.
Phobos DOM 1,579 events 122 cases 36.9 min
Veeva Safety DOM 1,021 events 99 cases 13.8 min
collaboration.merck.com App 31 events 11 cases
Microsoft Outlook Message 31 events 13 cases
Microsoft Teams App 23 events 18 cases
Acrobat App 20 events 8 cases
usc-excel.officeapps.live.com Document 18 events 3 cases
Microsoft Word Document 16 events 7 cases
Microsoft Excel Document 14 events 7 cases
RIM Vault DOM 12 events 2 cases 0.1 min
Adherence Vectors
Each task instance is scored on four behavioral vectors. Lower values are more adherent to the mined SoP.
Meta Score Distribution
Instance count in each 10-point adherence bucket. Right-skewed = healthy execution; long left tail = concentrated pain points.
Vector Contribution to Adherence Loss
Each vector's weighted contribution to lost adherence. The top row is your highest-leverage fix.
Lowest-Adherence Instances
The 5 task instances that scored lowest. These are the concrete cases worth investigating to understand the worst patterns.
| Case | Analyst | Score | Duration | Sub-Steps | Swivel | X-App | Revisit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2352940 | Analyst 09 | 57.5 | 9.4m | 6 | 0.83 | 0.00 | 2 |
| 2355278 | Analyst 13 | 62.5 | 1.0m | 3 | 0.67 | 0.00 | 1 |
| 2349955 | Analyst 03 | 62.5 | 0.2m | 3 | 0.67 | 0.00 | 1 |
| 2258699 | Analyst 13 | 67.5 | 0.0m | 2 | 0.50 | 0.00 | 1 |
| 2335834 | Analyst 09 | 67.5 | 0.6m | 2 | 0.50 | 0.00 | 1 |
Users on This Task
7 analysts executed this task during the pilot. Scatter plots productivity (instances per active day) against adherence (meta score). Top-right = healthy high-volume analysts; bottom-right = firefighters; top-left = careful low-volume; bottom-left = struggling.
User-by-User Breakdown
| Analyst | Instances | Inst / Day | Adherence | Weakest Vector | Swivel | X-App | Min | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ | Analyst 05 | 18 | 2.2 | 82.5 | Zero-Edit Visits | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 |
|
Reference SoP
1
View Intake Routed
2
collaboration.merck.com
Analyst 05's Dominant Sequence
— 18 of 18 instances
1
View Intake Routed
|
||||||||
| ▸ | Analyst 02 | 5 | 1.2 | 82.5 | Zero-Edit Visits | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1 |
|
Reference SoP
1
View Intake Routed
2
collaboration.merck.com
Analyst 02's Dominant Sequence
— 5 of 5 instances
1
View Intake Routed
|
||||||||
| ▸ | Analyst 12 | 38 | 4.8 | 82.1 | Zero-Edit Visits | 0.01 | 0.00 | 2,919 |
|
Reference SoP
1
View Intake Routed
2
collaboration.merck.com
Analyst 12's Dominant Sequence
— 37 of 38 instances
1
View Intake Routed
This analyst exhibits 2 distinct sequences across their 38 instances; the dominant one is shown.
|
||||||||
| ▸ | Analyst 01 | 46 | 5.8 | 82.0 | Zero-Edit Visits | 0.03 | 0.00 | 49 |
|
Reference SoP
1
View Intake Routed
2
collaboration.merck.com
Analyst 01's Dominant Sequence
— 44 of 46 instances
1
View Intake Routed
This analyst exhibits 3 distinct sequences across their 46 instances; the dominant one is shown.
|
||||||||
| ▸ | Analyst 03 | 73 | 6.6 | 81.6 | Zero-Edit Visits | 0.03 | 0.00 | 3 |
|
Reference SoP
1
View Intake Routed
2
collaboration.merck.com
Analyst 03's Dominant Sequence
— 69 of 73 instances
1
View Intake Routed
This analyst exhibits 4 distinct sequences across their 73 instances; the dominant one is shown.
|
||||||||
| ▸ | Analyst 09 | 91 | 7.0 | 80.9 | Zero-Edit Visits | 0.07 | 0.00 | 423 |
|
Reference SoP
1
View Intake Routed
2
collaboration.merck.com
Analyst 09's Dominant Sequence
— 79 of 91 instances
1
View Intake Routed
This analyst exhibits 8 distinct sequences across their 91 instances; the dominant one is shown.
|
||||||||
| ▸ | Analyst 13 | 25 | 3.6 | 80.7 | Zero-Edit Visits | 0.06 | 0.00 | 2 |
|
Reference SoP
1
View Intake Routed
2
collaboration.merck.com
Analyst 13's Dominant Sequence
— 21 of 25 instances
1
View Intake Routed
This analyst exhibits 5 distinct sequences across their 25 instances; the dominant one is shown.
|
||||||||
Verify Routing — Mined SoP
The most common sub-step sequence observed across 262 task instances. Use the dropdown on the right to compare any deviation to this baseline.
Application Mix
Which applications analysts touch while executing this task, measured by event count and active dwell time.
| Application | Events | Event Share | Dwell Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Phobos | 298 | 92.3% | 0.0% |
| Veeva Safety | 18 | 5.6% | 100.0% |
| collaboration.merck.com | 2 | 0.6% | 0.0% |
| Microsoft Teams | 2 | 0.6% | 0.0% |
| Microsoft Outlook | 2 | 0.6% | 0.0% |
| Acrobat | 1 | 0.3% | 0.0% |
Top Cross-App Transitions (within task instance)
Consecutive events that cross application boundaries within a task instance — the signal where swivel-chair patterns live.
| From | To | Transitions |
|---|---|---|
| Phobos | Veeva Safety | 16 |
| Phobos | collaboration.merck.com | 2 |
| Veeva Safety | Phobos | 1 |
| Phobos | Microsoft Teams | 1 |
| Phobos | Acrobat | 1 |
| Veeva Safety | Microsoft Outlook | 1 |
| Phobos | Microsoft Outlook | 1 |
| Veeva Safety | Microsoft Teams | 1 |
On-Case Application Journey (±15 min around anchor)
Apps the same analyst touched on the same case within ±15 minutes of the task anchor. Captures work that spans task boundaries — the Veeva/Acrobat/Outlook/Word context surrounding the anchor click.
Phobos DOM 1,579 events 122 cases 36.9 min
Veeva Safety DOM 1,021 events 99 cases 13.8 min
collaboration.merck.com App 31 events 11 cases
Microsoft Outlook Message 31 events 13 cases
Microsoft Teams App 23 events 18 cases
Acrobat App 20 events 8 cases
usc-excel.officeapps.live.com Document 18 events 3 cases
Microsoft Word Document 16 events 7 cases
Microsoft Excel Document 14 events 7 cases
RIM Vault DOM 12 events 2 cases 0.1 min
Adherence Vectors
Each task instance is scored on four behavioral vectors. Lower values are more adherent to the mined SoP.
Meta Score Distribution
Instance count in each 10-point adherence bucket. Right-skewed = healthy execution; long left tail = concentrated pain points.
Vector Contribution to Adherence Loss
Each vector's weighted contribution to lost adherence. The top row is your highest-leverage fix.
Lowest-Adherence Instances
The 5 task instances that scored lowest. These are the concrete cases worth investigating to understand the worst patterns.
| Case | Analyst | Score | Duration | Sub-Steps | Swivel | X-App | Revisit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2355278 | Analyst 13 | 62.5 | 1.0m | 3 | 0.67 | 0.00 | 1 |
| 2349955 | Analyst 03 | 62.5 | 0.2m | 3 | 0.67 | 0.00 | 1 |
| 2299873 | Analyst 12 | 67.5 | 2896.2m | 2 | 0.50 | 0.00 | 1 |
| 2335834 | Analyst 09 | 67.5 | 0.6m | 2 | 0.50 | 0.00 | 1 |
| 2348417 | Analyst 09 | 67.5 | 0.5m | 2 | 0.50 | 0.00 | 1 |
Users on This Task
7 analysts executed this task during the pilot. Scatter plots productivity (instances per active day) against adherence (meta score). Top-right = healthy high-volume analysts; bottom-right = firefighters; top-left = careful low-volume; bottom-left = struggling.
User-by-User Breakdown
| Analyst | Instances | Inst / Day | Adherence | Weakest Vector | Swivel | X-App | Min | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ | Analyst 02 | 5 | 1.2 | 82.5 | Zero-Edit Visits | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1 |
|
Reference SoP
1
View Intake Routed
2
collaboration.merck.com
Analyst 02's Dominant Sequence
— 5 of 5 instances
1
View Intake Routed
|
||||||||
| ▸ | Analyst 05 | 17 | 2.1 | 82.4 | Zero-Edit Visits | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 |
|
Reference SoP
1
View Intake Routed
2
collaboration.merck.com
Analyst 05's Dominant Sequence
— 17 of 17 instances
1
View Intake Routed
|
||||||||
| ▸ | Analyst 01 | 39 | 4.9 | 81.9 | Zero-Edit Visits | 0.01 | 0.00 | 40 |
|
Reference SoP
1
View Intake Routed
2
collaboration.merck.com
Analyst 01's Dominant Sequence
— 38 of 39 instances
1
View Intake Routed
This analyst exhibits 2 distinct sequences across their 39 instances; the dominant one is shown.
|
||||||||
| ▸ | Analyst 12 | 32 | 4.0 | 81.6 | Zero-Edit Visits | 0.02 | 0.00 | 2,919 |
|
Reference SoP
1
View Intake Routed
2
collaboration.merck.com
Analyst 12's Dominant Sequence
— 31 of 32 instances
1
View Intake Routed
This analyst exhibits 2 distinct sequences across their 32 instances; the dominant one is shown.
|
||||||||
| ▸ | Analyst 03 | 61 | 5.5 | 80.9 | Zero-Edit Visits | 0.04 | 0.00 | 3 |
|
Reference SoP
1
View Intake Routed
2
collaboration.merck.com
Analyst 03's Dominant Sequence
— 57 of 61 instances
1
View Intake Routed
This analyst exhibits 4 distinct sequences across their 61 instances; the dominant one is shown.
|
||||||||
| ▸ | Analyst 09 | 85 | 6.5 | 80.7 | Zero-Edit Visits | 0.07 | 0.00 | 415 |
|
Reference SoP
1
View Intake Routed
2
collaboration.merck.com
Analyst 09's Dominant Sequence
— 73 of 85 instances
1
View Intake Routed
This analyst exhibits 8 distinct sequences across their 85 instances; the dominant one is shown.
|
||||||||
| ▸ | Analyst 13 | 23 | 3.3 | 80.5 | Zero-Edit Visits | 0.06 | 0.00 | 2 |
|
Reference SoP
1
View Intake Routed
2
collaboration.merck.com
Analyst 13's Dominant Sequence
— 19 of 23 instances
1
View Intake Routed
This analyst exhibits 5 distinct sequences across their 23 instances; the dominant one is shown.
|
||||||||
Verify Routing — Mined SoP
The most common sub-step sequence observed across 262 task instances. Use the dropdown on the right to compare any deviation to this baseline.
Application Mix
Which applications analysts touch while executing this task, measured by event count and active dwell time.
| Application | Events | Event Share | Dwell Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Phobos | 298 | 90.9% | 0.0% |
| Veeva Safety | 19 | 5.8% | 100.0% |
| Microsoft Teams | 3 | 0.9% | 0.0% |
| Microsoft Excel | 3 | 0.9% | 0.0% |
| collaboration.merck.com | 2 | 0.6% | 0.0% |
| Microsoft Outlook | 2 | 0.6% | 0.0% |
| Acrobat | 1 | 0.3% | 0.0% |
Top Cross-App Transitions (within task instance)
Consecutive events that cross application boundaries within a task instance — the signal where swivel-chair patterns live.
| From | To | Transitions |
|---|---|---|
| Phobos | Veeva Safety | 17 |
| Phobos | collaboration.merck.com | 2 |
| Veeva Safety | Microsoft Teams | 1 |
| Veeva Safety | Microsoft Excel | 1 |
| Veeva Safety | Microsoft Outlook | 1 |
| Veeva Safety | Phobos | 1 |
| Microsoft Excel | Microsoft Teams | 1 |
| Microsoft Teams | Microsoft Excel | 1 |
| Phobos | Acrobat | 1 |
| Phobos | Microsoft Teams | 1 |
On-Case Application Journey (±15 min around anchor)
Apps the same analyst touched on the same case within ±15 minutes of the task anchor. Captures work that spans task boundaries — the Veeva/Acrobat/Outlook/Word context surrounding the anchor click.
Phobos DOM 1,579 events 122 cases 36.9 min
Veeva Safety DOM 1,021 events 99 cases 13.8 min
collaboration.merck.com App 31 events 11 cases
Microsoft Outlook Message 31 events 13 cases
Microsoft Teams App 23 events 18 cases
Acrobat App 20 events 8 cases
usc-excel.officeapps.live.com Document 18 events 3 cases
Microsoft Word Document 16 events 7 cases
Microsoft Excel Document 14 events 7 cases
RIM Vault DOM 12 events 2 cases 0.1 min
Adherence Vectors
Each task instance is scored on four behavioral vectors. Lower values are more adherent to the mined SoP.
Meta Score Distribution
Instance count in each 10-point adherence bucket. Right-skewed = healthy execution; long left tail = concentrated pain points.
Vector Contribution to Adherence Loss
Each vector's weighted contribution to lost adherence. The top row is your highest-leverage fix.
Lowest-Adherence Instances
The 5 task instances that scored lowest. These are the concrete cases worth investigating to understand the worst patterns.
| Case | Analyst | Score | Duration | Sub-Steps | Swivel | X-App | Revisit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2352940 | Analyst 09 | 57.5 | 9.4m | 6 | 0.83 | 0.00 | 2 |
| 2349955 | Analyst 03 | 62.5 | 0.2m | 3 | 0.67 | 0.00 | 1 |
| 2355278 | Analyst 13 | 62.5 | 1.0m | 3 | 0.67 | 0.00 | 1 |
| 2334756 | Analyst 09 | 67.5 | 0.0m | 2 | 0.50 | 0.00 | 1 |
| 2348417 | Analyst 09 | 67.5 | 0.5m | 2 | 0.50 | 0.00 | 1 |
Users on This Task
7 analysts executed this task during the pilot. Scatter plots productivity (instances per active day) against adherence (meta score). Top-right = healthy high-volume analysts; bottom-right = firefighters; top-left = careful low-volume; bottom-left = struggling.
User-by-User Breakdown
| Analyst | Instances | Inst / Day | Adherence | Weakest Vector | Swivel | X-App | Min | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ | Analyst 02 | 5 | 1.2 | 82.5 | Zero-Edit Visits | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1 |
|
Reference SoP
1
View Intake Routed
2
collaboration.merck.com
Analyst 02's Dominant Sequence
— 5 of 5 instances
1
View Intake Routed
|
||||||||
| ▸ | Analyst 05 | 17 | 2.1 | 82.4 | Zero-Edit Visits | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 |
|
Reference SoP
1
View Intake Routed
2
collaboration.merck.com
Analyst 05's Dominant Sequence
— 17 of 17 instances
1
View Intake Routed
|
||||||||
| ▸ | Analyst 12 | 32 | 4.0 | 81.6 | Zero-Edit Visits | 0.02 | 0.00 | 2,919 |
|
Reference SoP
1
View Intake Routed
2
collaboration.merck.com
Analyst 12's Dominant Sequence
— 31 of 32 instances
1
View Intake Routed
This analyst exhibits 2 distinct sequences across their 32 instances; the dominant one is shown.
|
||||||||
| ▸ | Analyst 01 | 39 | 4.9 | 81.5 | Zero-Edit Visits | 0.03 | 0.00 | 49 |
|
Reference SoP
1
View Intake Routed
2
collaboration.merck.com
Analyst 01's Dominant Sequence
— 37 of 39 instances
1
View Intake Routed
This analyst exhibits 3 distinct sequences across their 39 instances; the dominant one is shown.
|
||||||||
| ▸ | Analyst 03 | 61 | 5.5 | 80.9 | Zero-Edit Visits | 0.04 | 0.00 | 3 |
|
Reference SoP
1
View Intake Routed
2
collaboration.merck.com
Analyst 03's Dominant Sequence
— 57 of 61 instances
1
View Intake Routed
This analyst exhibits 4 distinct sequences across their 61 instances; the dominant one is shown.
|
||||||||
| ▸ | Analyst 09 | 85 | 6.5 | 80.6 | Zero-Edit Visits | 0.08 | 0.00 | 423 |
|
Reference SoP
1
View Intake Routed
2
collaboration.merck.com
Analyst 09's Dominant Sequence
— 73 of 85 instances
1
View Intake Routed
This analyst exhibits 8 distinct sequences across their 85 instances; the dominant one is shown.
|
||||||||
| ▸ | Analyst 13 | 23 | 3.3 | 80.5 | Zero-Edit Visits | 0.06 | 0.00 | 2 |
|
Reference SoP
1
View Intake Routed
2
collaboration.merck.com
Analyst 13's Dominant Sequence
— 19 of 23 instances
1
View Intake Routed
This analyst exhibits 5 distinct sequences across their 23 instances; the dominant one is shown.
|
||||||||