Task-Boundary Mode How task-instance boundaries are drawn from the event stream. Applies to every Task SoP, Step SoP, and Variants view.
378
Cases Observed
1,637 events · 14 analysts
1.7 min
Median Cycle Time
Avg 698.3 min
0.05 min
Median Active Handling
Excludes >5-min idle gaps
1
Path Variants Observed
Across 1 applications
81.3
Step Adherence Score (0-100)
Weighted mean across 1 task · 1,184 instances

Tasks in this Step

1 task compose this step. Each has its own mined SoP, adherence scoring, and sub-step variant analysis — drill into any task for the detail.

Advance Case
3 sub-tasks
1,184 instances 15 analysts 33.8 min avg
Adherence 81.3
Process Owner
Case Processor
📝 Download Word SOP ⭳ Export BPMN 2.0
Regulatory Context Advancement events establish the audit trail for case handoffs. Must be captured accurately for downstream SLA measurement.
Why this SOP is audit-grade Every step below is captured at the DOM element level (button labels, field IDs, section panels) — not as screenshot coordinates. Every metric is derived from 1,637 real events across 378 cases, with confidence and case evidence visible per step.

Step Journey

Click a task to see the application journey on the same case, then click an application to drill into the execution detail Pyze captured for it.

Level 2 · Application Journey
Advance Case — 10 apps touched within ±15 min of this task on the same case
Case counts per app are not mutually exclusive — a case that touched both Veeva and Phobos in this window is counted in both rows. Overlap reflects real cross-app work, not double-counted cases.
Level 3 · Execution Detail
Veeva Safety
DOM-level capture
Pyze JS captures every element interaction — button labels, field IDs, section panels.
pyzeClick <span> "Complete" 1943×
pyzeClick <a> "Show more" 476×
pyzeClick <span> "Narrative" 470×
pyzeClick <span> "Continue" 447×
pyzeClick <button> "Save" 422×
pyzeClick <li> "Narrative" 395×
pyzeClick <span> "Adverse Events" 349×
pyzeClick <li> "Details" 325×
Level 3 · Execution Detail
Phobos
DOM-level capture
Pyze JS captures every element interaction — button labels, field IDs, section panels.
pyzeClick <button> "Proceed" 359×
pyzeClick <button> "Advance" 225×
pyzeClick <button> "Save Comments" 183×
pyzeClick <button> "Send to process" 114×
pyzeClick <select> "Select Attachment description · Legal · Legal Pre-Sca" 102×
pyzeClick <select> "Select Compound · - sitagliptin phosphate Tablet (G" 94×
pyzeClick <a> "Cases" 85×
pyzeClick <button> "Send to Medical Review" 68×
Level 3 · Execution Detail
Microsoft Word
Document-level capture
Task Mining captures the specific file open during work — file names often encode case context.
file V-Narrative 552979 (English) (26689105_0_2_348832) 1638×
file V-Narrative 540591 (English) (26495494_0_2_345212) 723×
file V-Narrative 534252 (English) (26399499_0_2_343143) 572×
file V-Narrative 549550 (English) (26643764_0_1_347593) 526×
file V-Narrative 528191 (English) (26300681_0_1_338349) 382×
file V-Narrative 533882 (English) (26397511_0_1_345751) 308×
file V-Narrative 553023 (English) (26689066_0_2_351253) 257×
file V-Narrative 542512 (English) (26522671_0_2_344761) 255×
Level 3 · Execution Detail
Acrobat
App-level capture
Only application name and dwell time available. Direct instrumentation would unlock deeper detail.
5,505 granular events captured, but no DOM, document, or message-level metadata is available for this application. Instrumenting this app directly with Pyze would unlock element-level detail.
Level 3 · Execution Detail
Microsoft Teams
App-level capture
Only application name and dwell time available. Direct instrumentation would unlock deeper detail.
4,239 granular events captured, but no DOM, document, or message-level metadata is available for this application. Instrumenting this app directly with Pyze would unlock element-level detail.

Standard Flow

Representative application journey — the dominant app-to-app transitions observed in the pilot data. Tier badge shows how deeply Pyze captures each application.

Veeva Safety
DOM
6,714 events · 378 cases
Phobos
DOM
729 events · 119 cases
Veeva Safety
DOM
6,714 events · 378 cases
Microsoft Word
Document
176 events · 50 cases
Veeva Safety
DOM
6,714 events · 378 cases
Dominant transitions chained from real observations. Specific case journeys appear as variants below. Use the Step Journey above to drill into any task.

Step Variants

Distinct task-sequence patterns observed across cases in this step. Click a variant on the left to see its task sequence, business impact, and recommended remediations on the right.

Reference Case Advancement (step-level) Reference Path 425 cases · 15 analysts · 4× same-task rework
Task Sequence
1. Advance Case
Automated Explanation rule-based
This is the mined reference path — 425 instances across 15 analysts follow this exact sequence. Treat as the proposed Standard Operating Procedure for Case Advancement (step-level).
📄
Detailed Step Reference
Full DOM element detail + case evidence for every step (1 total) — mostly for BA and RPA-developer use
1

Advance Case

Complete Action None
1,184 observations 425 cases 15 analysts Median 60.0s 100% high confidence

Top Application Transitions

Top app-to-app hops observed during this stage. Each pair is a single swivel-chair move, ranked by frequency.

Rank From App To App Cases Frequency Share
1
Phobos DOM
Veeva Safety DOM
113 196
26.3%
2
Veeva Safety DOM
Phobos DOM
112 193
25.9%
3
Veeva Safety DOM
Microsoft Word Document
47 91
12.2%
4
Microsoft Teams App
Veeva Safety DOM
49 90
12.1%
5
Microsoft Word Document
Veeva Safety DOM
41 89
11.9%
6
Veeva Safety DOM
Microsoft Teams App
44 86
11.5%

Path Variants

Top 10 full application journeys observed through this stage (consecutive duplicates collapsed). Shows the actual end-to-end paths cases take — not just single transitions.

Rank Hops Application sequence Cases Share of cases
1 1
Veeva Safety DOM
197
52.1%
2 3
Veeva Safety DOM Phobos DOM Veeva Safety DOM
34
9.0%
3 5
Veeva Safety DOM Phobos DOM Veeva Safety DOM Phobos DOM Veeva Safety DOM
12
3.2%
4 7
Veeva Safety DOM Phobos DOM Veeva Safety DOM Phobos DOM Veeva Safety DOM Phobos DOM Veeva Safety DOM
8
2.1%
5 3
Veeva Safety DOM Microsoft Teams App Veeva Safety DOM
5
1.3%
6 3
Veeva Safety DOM Microsoft Excel Document Veeva Safety DOM
4
1.1%
7 3
Veeva Safety DOM Acrobat App Veeva Safety DOM
4
1.1%
8 5
Veeva Safety DOM Microsoft Teams App Veeva Safety DOM Phobos DOM Veeva Safety DOM
3
0.8%
9 3
Veeva Safety DOM Microsoft Word Document Veeva Safety DOM
3
0.8%
10 4
Veeva Safety DOM Microsoft Word Document collaboration.merck.com App Veeva Safety DOM
2
0.5%
A "1-hop" path means the case stayed in a single application for this stage. Longer paths indicate cross-app work — those are the ones to investigate for swivel-chair reduction opportunities.

Applications Footprint

Where work actually happens during this stage. Cross-app time flags potential integration or UX opportunities.

Application Capture tier Events Cases touched Avg dwell per event Total minutes in stage
Veeva Safety DOM 1,637 378 1.11s
30.2 min

Drift Monitoring

Compares observed behavior against the published SOP. Drift signals feed compliance events and trigger automatic SOP refresh.

Drift level
High
Top path concentration
100.0%
Distinct transitions
1
Emerging steps
0
Unstable steps
0
Rare apps
8
Uneven adoption apps
6

Rare apps (used on <15% of cases)

ApplicationCapture tierCases usingEvents% of casesAction
Microsoft Teams App 52 146 13.8% Shadow tool signal · Flag for investigation →
Microsoft Word Document 50 176 13.2% Shadow tool signal · Flag for investigation →
Acrobat App 41 169 10.8% Shadow tool signal · Flag for investigation →
Microsoft Outlook Message 39 67 10.3% Shadow tool signal · Flag for investigation →
Microsoft Excel Document 34 57 9.0% Shadow tool signal · Flag for investigation →
collaboration.merck.com App 26 46 6.9% Shadow tool signal · Flag for investigation →
Notepad App 9 17 2.4% Shadow tool signal · Flag for investigation →
olk Message 7 7 1.9% Shadow tool signal · Flag for investigation →

Uneven adoption apps (used by minority of analysts)

ApplicationAnalysts usingTotal eventsAdoptionAction
Microsoft Outlook 6 67 38.0% Training or knowledge-transfer opportunity · Review users →
Microsoft Excel 5 57 31.0% Training or knowledge-transfer opportunity · Review users →
apps.powerapps.com 5 29 31.0% Training or knowledge-transfer opportunity · Review users →
runtime-app.powerplatform.com 2 24 13.0% Training or knowledge-transfer opportunity · Review users →
Notepad 1 17 6.0% Training or knowledge-transfer opportunity · Review users →
evocpr01.apps.americas.cf.merck.com 1 12 6.0% Training or knowledge-transfer opportunity · Review users →
Continuous monitoring active This SOP reflects observed behavior through the 19-day pilot. In production, drift signals are checked hourly and published SOPs auto-refresh when consensus shifts. Drift events appear in the admin audit log with a diff against the previous version.